Where should I file?
PI grant rate by division, average time-to-decision, patent-owner-friendliness — by the numbers, not by gut feel.
Forum strategy
Forum Strategy
The same case, different odds.
Main proceedings by division: volume, speed, and case mix.
Division
Cases
To outcome
Case mix
Munich
386
10.4mo
58%33%9%
Düsseldorf
221
8.0mo
58%25%17%
Mannheim
188
17.4mo
62%35%3%
Hamburg
98
11.0mo
57%23%20%
The Hague
85
7.8mo
67%16%17%
Infringement Revocation Prov. measures
2,850+
Cases indexed
1,950+
Decisions
140+
Judges profiled
1,900+
Parties profiled
Six strategic questions, answered with data.
We classify every UPC outcome: infringed, revoked, granted, dismissed. So questions that used to mean reading a hundred PDFs take one click to answer.
What does drawing this judge mean?
Ruling tendencies, PI grant rate, history with similar parties. Word-of-mouth made queryable.
Judge intelligence
What kind of opponent is this company?
Filing frequency, settle-vs-litigate ratio, win record, firms they retain, patents they assert.
Adversary profiling
Who's good at this kind of case?
Activity by firm, specialization, win records, recurring pairings. For GCs picking outside counsel.
Firm scorecards
What's normal for this case?
Historical PI grant rate, revocation rate, infringement-finding rate. Settlements priced on data.
Outcome base rates
Tell me when something matters.
Push alerts when a competitor is sued, a portfolio patent is challenged, or a precedent lands.
Monitoring
Litigators, in-house teams, and underwriters.
Litigators
Pick the right division. Read the right judge. Quote the right base rate in mediation. Build forum-shopping memos with citations, not anecdotes.
See the litigator viewGeneral counsel & in-house IP
Benchmark outside counsel by win record. Track adversaries before they file. Forecast settlement value with the actual UPC base rate.
See the in-house viewUnderwriters & bond providers
Security-for-costs deposits, grant rates, forfeiture rates by division. Sized for litigation funders and bond providers underwriting UPC security orders.
See the underwriter viewTwo ways to begin. Both without commitment.
Professional
€199per user, per month
or €1,999 per user, per year
14-day free trial. Full access, no credit card.
Everything we have, self-serve. Bring your own matter, or explore the full case database.
- ✦All 13 UPC divisions
- ✦Preliminary injunction grant rates by division
- ✦1,950+ decisions, classified by outcome
- ✦Judge, firm, and party profiles
- ✦Export to PDF & DOCX
After your trial, pay by card or invoice.
Funder & insurer data desk
From €9,900 per year: portfolio monitoring, security-for-costs intelligence, and bespoke exports for funders and underwriting desks.
Questions, answered.
Is UPClytics limited to the Unified Patent Court?
Yes. The UPC is pan-European, multilingual, three years old, and underserved by legacy patent-litigation tools. Adjacent EPO and national-office data is referenced where it sharpens a UPC question.
What does 'forum strategy' mean at the UPC?
Forum strategy is choosing which of the UPC's 13 local, regional, and central divisions to file in. Divisions diverge in preliminary-injunction grant rates, time-to-decision, language of proceedings, and patent owner win share — the choice meaningfully shapes both odds and timeline.
How quickly is a new filing reflected?
New filings are indexed daily from the public docket. Decisions are extracted, classified, and surfaced as they land.
Do you support German, French, Italian, Dutch?
Yes — decisions are processed natively in their issued language, then normalized into structured outcomes a non-native reader can use.
What is a security-for-costs order at the UPC?
Under R.158 of the UPC Rules of Procedure and Art. 69(4) UPCA, a defendant may ask the court to order the claimant to post security for the defendant's likely costs. The Court of Appeal in Syntorr v. Arthrex clarified that litigation-insurance policies can satisfy this requirement.